Luanti Documentation project

User avatar
LMD
Member
Posts: 1500
Joined: Sat Apr 08, 2017 08:16
GitHub: appgurueu
IRC: appguru[eu]
In-game: LMD
Location: Germany
Contact:

Re: Luanti Documentation project

by LMD » Post

this would be the best option after a self-hosted Git (e.g. Forgejo) for the Core and Mods.
A self-hosted Git would be a terrible option given the track record of self-hosted software (e.g. forums, wiki) we have seen. We simply don't really have experienced web admins who could and would want to do this. And even if we had them, this would feel like a waste of their time and money when there are perfectly fine options like Codeberg. Not to mention that we would miss out on discoverability on these platforms.
My stuff: Projects - Mods - Website

User avatar
Blockhead
Moderator
Posts: 2985
Joined: Wed Jul 17, 2019 10:14
GitHub: Montandalar
IRC: Blockhead256
In-game: Blockhead Blockhead256
Location: Land Down Under
Contact:

Re: Luanti Documentation project

by Blockhead » Post

LMD wrote:
Thu Feb 06, 2025 18:12
this would be the best option after a self-hosted Git (e.g. Forgejo) for the Core and Mods.
A self-hosted Git would be a terrible option given the track record of self-hosted software (e.g. forums, wiki) we have seen. We simply don't really have experienced web admins who could and would want to do this. And even if we had them, this would feel like a waste of their time and money when there are perfectly fine options like Codeberg. Not to mention that we would miss out on discoverability on these platforms.
Sending some hosting-funding money the way of Codeberg sounds like a great arrangement compared to hosting our own, +1.
/˳˳_˳˳]_[˳˳_˳˳]_[˳˳_˳˳\ Advtrains enthusiast | My map: Noah's Railyard | My Content on ContentDB ✝️♂

User avatar
Mantar
Member
Posts: 688
Joined: Thu Oct 05, 2017 18:46
Contact:

Re: Luanti Documentation project

by Mantar » Post

real_mineplayer wrote:
Thu Feb 06, 2025 17:27
after a self-hosted Git
Why do people keep suggesting this? We have a self-hosted forum as an example of how much time and energy the dev team can put in to projects like this, and it's continually one step away from falling over completely due to lack of maintenance.
Lead dev of Exile, git repo: https://codeberg.org/Mantar/Exile

User avatar
Wuzzy
Member
Posts: 5104
Joined: Mon Sep 24, 2012 15:01
GitHub: Wuzzy2
IRC: Wuzzy
In-game: Wuzzy
Contact:

Re: Luanti Documentation project

by Wuzzy » Post

OMG. The GitHub shadowban is awful. And yeah, if the corpoation believes you're an evil scammer/hacker/spy/etc. it is very hard to convince them they're wrong since they view you as their enemy and basically automatically distrust everything you say. And frankly, Microsoft has ZERO reason to care about false-positives, especially when it hits non-paying users. They still make their money either way.
This is the price for being a "free" user on commercial platforms.

This doesn't really help the chances of me contributing to the new project.

By the way, regarding the Minetest → Luanti rename I did on the wiki: This was actually half-automated, not fully manual (as was claimed). I still used some tools on the wiki export to find the word quickly, this saved me some time over the website search feature (which was slow). The actual edits, however, were manual.

User avatar
Linuxdirk
Member
Posts: 3414
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2014 11:21
In-game: Linuxdirk
Location: Germany
Contact:

Re: Luanti Documentation project

by Linuxdirk » Post

Mantar wrote:
Fri Feb 07, 2025 22:18
real_mineplayer wrote:
Thu Feb 06, 2025 17:27
after a self-hosted Git
Why do people keep suggesting this?
Because it is the only REAL free solution.

Maintaining a Forgejo instance isn’t actually hard, though.

real_mineplayer
Member
Posts: 79
Joined: Sat Jun 15, 2024 19:43

Re: Luanti Documentation project

by real_mineplayer » Post

Linuxdirk wrote:
Mon Feb 10, 2025 20:04
Mantar wrote:
Fri Feb 07, 2025 22:18
real_mineplayer wrote:
Thu Feb 06, 2025 17:27
after a self-hosted Git
Why do people keep suggesting this?
Because it is the only REAL free solution.

Maintaining a Forgejo instance isn’t actually hard, though.
I can understand that they don't want to maintain an own git instance. But I can't understand why it has to be Github and can't be Codeberg because it's better than Github and you can also create an account with your Github / Gitlab one, so everyone with access to Github should also be able to use Codeberg.

User avatar
Mantar
Member
Posts: 688
Joined: Thu Oct 05, 2017 18:46
Contact:

Re: Luanti Documentation project

by Mantar » Post

Linuxdirk wrote:
Mon Feb 10, 2025 20:04
Because it is the only REAL free solution.
It's libre software from top to bottom and run by an open community that has consistently demonstrated a strong commitment to the principles of free software. If that's not free, then neither is Luanti!
Maintaining a Forgejo instance isn’t actually hard, though.
Yes, and neither is keeping a forum working, but the report button has been using the wrong url for what, six months now? Self hosting's extra work that somebody has to do, and you ought to provide a reasonable justification for why it's necessary.
Lead dev of Exile, git repo: https://codeberg.org/Mantar/Exile

User avatar
mark-wiemer
New member
Posts: 9
Joined: Sat Oct 19, 2024 05:08
GitHub: mark-wiemer
IRC: mark-wiemer
Contact:

Re: Luanti Documentation project

by mark-wiemer » Post

Glad to see continued discussion here. I'll be discussing moving to Codeberg more with the docs team (#luanti-docs on IRC), though we are still working on categorization, spell-checking, and some other "quick fixes" that I think will provide better user experience in the short term. That said, I don't know of anyone against Codeberg, really, the only challenge is doing the hard work of making sure every little thing works during the migration, and that's my specialty :)
Contributor to docs.luanti.org, hoping to eventually make a Luanti game! 🤓 markwiemer.com

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests