[Server] LinuxForks (Lots of trains)

yw05
Member
Posts: 402
Joined: Tue May 07, 2019 12:59
GitHub: y5nw
IRC: y5nw
Location: Germany

Re: [Server] LinuxForks (Lots of trains)

by yw05 » Post

MineBrother wrote:
Tue Dec 27, 2022 12:24
So wait i'm unbanned then because I knew the lesson never go to trap city ever again because it's really a trap city?
The exact opposite: you were banned because you repeatedly went to TC depite being told not to do so.

W3RQ01
Member
Posts: 157
Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2020 06:33
GitHub: W3RQ01
In-game: Dario23 or W3RQ01
Contact:

Re: [Server] LinuxForks (Lots of trains)

by W3RQ01 » Post

I think that Trap City is just a waste of time and resources, also the enforcement of the "restricted area" falls when the owner logs out. You can't keep private things that appear on the map render or in the wiki with sometimes photos. I went sometimes to Trap city, i don't like it but the areas name is ignored quite easily.
OneUnitedPower

User avatar
Blockhead
Moderator
Posts: 2170
Joined: Wed Jul 17, 2019 10:14
GitHub: Montandalar
IRC: Blockhead256
In-game: Blockhead Blockhead256
Location: Land Down Under
Contact:

Re: [Server] LinuxForks (Lots of trains)

by Blockhead » Post

I'm not opposed to the idea of the "keep out flag" for areas in principle but what if you're on a train? Some kind of border control would help though. I'm not sure the train services to Trap City should just be cancelled, but a custom solution would have to do complex logic to identify whether someone could enter the area and decide to kick them off the train at that stop (thereafter if they try to walk, the "keep out flag" will still do its job). And an area flag doesn't really need more areas in general, people just need to flag existing areas they should already have. Trap City certainly has plenty of areas.
/˳˳_˳˳]_[˳˳_˳˳]_[˳˳_˳˳\ Advtrains enthusiast | My map: Noah's Railyard | My Content on ContentDB ✝️♂

yw05
Member
Posts: 402
Joined: Tue May 07, 2019 12:59
GitHub: y5nw
IRC: y5nw
Location: Germany

Re: [Server] LinuxForks (Lots of trains)

by yw05 » Post

W3RQ01 wrote:
Tue Dec 27, 2022 12:41
I think that Trap City is just a waste of time and resources,
I do not see how that justifies entering areas that are out of bounds.
also the enforcement of the "restricted area" falls when the owner logs out.
This is partly what the "keep out flag" suggested by 56independent should do.
You can't keep private things that appear on the map render or in the wiki with sometimes photos. I went sometimes to Trap city, i don't like it but the areas name is ignored quite easily.
No. Think about real life.
Blockhead wrote:
Tue Dec 27, 2022 12:41
I'm not opposed to the idea of the "keep out flag" for areas in principle but what if you're on a train? Some kind of border control would help though. I'm not sure the train services to Trap City should just be cancelled, but a custom solution would have to do complex logic to identify whether someone could enter the area and decide to kick them off the train at that stop (thereafter if they try to walk, the "keep out flag" will still do its job).
An alternative I could think of would be to add a station at the border that requires passengers to get off and cross the border manually. You do not have to interrupt the tracks for that, as players walking on the tracks would be kept out as usual, and the fact that the trains do not operate past the border would involve less border-related logic.

That said, the downside with this alternative solution is that transit within TC would be made impossible if this was desired. This could be solved by adding priorities to the flag though.
And an area flag doesn't really need more areas in general, people just need to flag existing areas they should already have. Trap City certainly has plenty of areas.
I am somewhat concerned in terms of area flags (potentially, as the current areas are not necessarily designed to cover specific features) increasing the number of areas, but I suppose the only way to find out is by actually implementing and using the feature.

Maverick2797
Member
Posts: 141
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2018 12:37
In-game: Maverick2797
Location: Poking about here and there...

Re: [Server] LinuxForks (Lots of trains)

by Maverick2797 » Post

I have implemented automatic de-passenger-ing at Arcadius Station (the last station before TC on the S20) and the train continues through after an extended delay with a warning being added to the train's text. Ye be warned!
The number you have called is not available during a solar eclipse. This message will self destruct in ten seconds in protest... [BEEP]

User avatar
rubenwardy
Moderator
Posts: 7025
Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2012 18:11
GitHub: rubenwardy
IRC: rubenwardy
In-game: rubenwardy
Location: London, United Kingdom
Contact:

Re: [Server] LinuxForks (Lots of trains)

by rubenwardy » Post

If you don't want people in your area, maybe you should play single player or on a private server
Renewed Tab (my browser add-on) | Donate | Mods | Minetest Modding Book

Hello profile reader

User avatar
MineBrother
Member
Posts: 62
Joined: Sat Sep 10, 2022 12:30
IRC: TestBoy
In-game: MineBrother
Location: Xanadu

Re: [Server] LinuxForks (Lots of trains)

by MineBrother » Post

I'm Still Waiting To Get Unbanned For Learning Not To Go To Trap City Anymore Unless I Have Permission

yw05
Member
Posts: 402
Joined: Tue May 07, 2019 12:59
GitHub: y5nw
IRC: y5nw
Location: Germany

Re: [Server] LinuxForks (Lots of trains)

by yw05 » Post

Maverick2797 wrote:
Tue Dec 27, 2022 13:58
I have implemented automatic de-passenger-ing at Arcadius Station (the last station before TC on the S20) and the train continues through after an extended delay with a warning being added to the train's text. Ye be warned!
As an addition, perhaps we need to add a flag to Advtrains to prevent players from entering a train. That would belong to the Advtrains mailing list though, although the "keep out" flag is the main thing to work on here.
rubenwardy wrote:
Tue Dec 27, 2022 14:33
If you don't want people in your area, maybe you should play single player or on a private server
Not exactly. From my understanding, the main reason they do not appreciate visitors is that there are two people involved in the project, and the security at the construction sites is a bit loose to make it easier to exchange items; so they want to keep things closed until they finish it.

User avatar
Blockhead
Moderator
Posts: 2170
Joined: Wed Jul 17, 2019 10:14
GitHub: Montandalar
IRC: Blockhead256
In-game: Blockhead Blockhead256
Location: Land Down Under
Contact:

Re: [Server] LinuxForks (Lots of trains)

by Blockhead » Post

rubenwardy wrote:
Tue Dec 27, 2022 14:33
If you don't want people in your area, maybe you should play single player or on a private server
Unfortunately the person(s) who needs to hear this most doesn't regularly visit the forums as far as I know, despite also having a private Minetest server. Some people just want it both ways.
/˳˳_˳˳]_[˳˳_˳˳]_[˳˳_˳˳\ Advtrains enthusiast | My map: Noah's Railyard | My Content on ContentDB ✝️♂

User avatar
MineBrother
Member
Posts: 62
Joined: Sat Sep 10, 2022 12:30
IRC: TestBoy
In-game: MineBrother
Location: Xanadu

Re: [Server] LinuxForks (Lots of trains)

by MineBrother » Post

Can you at least unban me since i learned going to restriced areas like trap city is not good at all with no permission?
please don't be mean to me! can i at least look at the rules again but this time with sharp response?
Last edited by MineBrother on Tue Dec 27, 2022 19:25, edited 1 time in total.

W3RQ01
Member
Posts: 157
Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2020 06:33
GitHub: W3RQ01
In-game: Dario23 or W3RQ01
Contact:

Re: [Server] LinuxForks (Lots of trains)

by W3RQ01 » Post

MineBrother wrote:
Tue Dec 27, 2022 17:38
Can you at least unban me since i learned going to restriced areas like trap city is not good at all with no permission?
please don't me mean to me! can i at least look at the rules again but this time with sharp response?
When the ban will end they will unban you, stop asking.
OneUnitedPower

User avatar
MineBrother
Member
Posts: 62
Joined: Sat Sep 10, 2022 12:30
IRC: TestBoy
In-game: MineBrother
Location: Xanadu

Re: [Server] LinuxForks (Lots of trains)

by MineBrother » Post

I Expect The Banning Length Is 1 Year

MrBee
New member
Posts: 8
Joined: Sat Apr 11, 2020 17:18
IRC: MrBee
In-game: MrBee
Location: Hive

Re: [Server] LinuxForks (Lots of trains)

by MrBee » Post

Excuse me but what is "Restricted Areas"?

yw05
Member
Posts: 402
Joined: Tue May 07, 2019 12:59
GitHub: y5nw
IRC: y5nw
Location: Germany

Re: [Server] LinuxForks (Lots of trains)

by yw05 » Post

MineBrother wrote:
Tue Dec 27, 2022 19:26
I Expect The Banning Length Is 1 Year
Not if you keep whining.
MrBee wrote:
Tue Dec 27, 2022 19:55
Excuse me but what is "Restricted Areas"?
I have only seen people use the term "private area", but basically this refers to areas that only certain players are allowed access to.

The main reason (from what I see) that MineBrother's situation stirred up a lot of discussion here is that it involves a large construction site (which is often considered private on the server, as I explained in an earlier post) without much warning that the area is out of bounds, and players are only told to not enter the area via the chat.

User avatar
MineBrother
Member
Posts: 62
Joined: Sat Sep 10, 2022 12:30
IRC: TestBoy
In-game: MineBrother
Location: Xanadu

Re: [Server] LinuxForks (Lots of trains)

by MineBrother » Post

Can I At Least Go To The Origin Court To Prove That I'm Innocent?

yw05
Member
Posts: 402
Joined: Tue May 07, 2019 12:59
GitHub: y5nw
IRC: y5nw
Location: Germany

Re: [Server] LinuxForks (Lots of trains)

by yw05 » Post

MineBrother wrote:
Tue Dec 27, 2022 20:36
Can I At Least Go To The Origin Court To Prove That I'm Innocent?
Yes, but not all moderators are online at the moment, and some are busy.

MrBee
New member
Posts: 8
Joined: Sat Apr 11, 2020 17:18
IRC: MrBee
In-game: MrBee
Location: Hive

Re: [Server] LinuxForks (Lots of trains)

by MrBee » Post

Mostly seems like admins just have to add barriers & teleports for these areas. Nothing stops player from intruding into area so basically banning players for reasons like this seems to be kinda weird.
In my opinion this "malicious intruder" really wants to play here, be merciful if you are judging for reasons like "not appreciating visitors"

User avatar
56independent_actual
Member
Posts: 452
Joined: Sun May 23, 2021 16:10
IRC: independent56
In-game: 56independent
Location: Girona Province
Contact:

Re: [Server] LinuxForks (Lots of trains)

by 56independent_actual » Post

💥
Last edited by 56independent_actual on Sun Jan 15, 2023 15:53, edited 1 time in total.
Warnig: Al my laguage ekscept English is bad, includig Hungarian (magyàränoлиски), Spanish (esпagnyoл), and Russian (рÿсскïанöл).

MrBee
New member
Posts: 8
Joined: Sat Apr 11, 2020 17:18
IRC: MrBee
In-game: MrBee
Location: Hive

Re: [Server] LinuxForks (Lots of trains)

by MrBee » Post

56independent_actual wrote:
Tue Dec 27, 2022 21:02
Please, record the court proceeding and publish it so we can see the Justice system of LF. Maybe Edward Snowden will get involved!
Lmao jury trial in minetest. Do we have a lawyer for MineBrother?

User avatar
56independent_actual
Member
Posts: 452
Joined: Sun May 23, 2021 16:10
IRC: independent56
In-game: 56independent
Location: Girona Province
Contact:

Re: [Server] LinuxForks (Lots of trains)

by 56independent_actual » Post

💥
Last edited by 56independent_actual on Sun Jan 15, 2023 15:53, edited 2 times in total.
Warnig: Al my laguage ekscept English is bad, includig Hungarian (magyàränoлиски), Spanish (esпagnyoл), and Russian (рÿсскïанöл).

W3RQ01
Member
Posts: 157
Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2020 06:33
GitHub: W3RQ01
In-game: Dario23 or W3RQ01
Contact:

Re: [Server] LinuxForks (Lots of trains)

by W3RQ01 » Post

I support MineBrother i think because i think that saying "restricted area" in minetest is useless and nonsensical. For the rest i am not fully aware of what happened so i'm going to just follow the case.
OneUnitedPower

User avatar
56independent_actual
Member
Posts: 452
Joined: Sun May 23, 2021 16:10
IRC: independent56
In-game: 56independent
Location: Girona Province
Contact:

Re: [Server] LinuxForks (Lots of trains)

by 56independent_actual » Post

💥
Last edited by 56independent_actual on Sun Jan 15, 2023 15:54, edited 1 time in total.
Warnig: Al my laguage ekscept English is bad, includig Hungarian (magyàränoлиски), Spanish (esпagnyoл), and Russian (рÿсскïанöл).

yw05
Member
Posts: 402
Joined: Tue May 07, 2019 12:59
GitHub: y5nw
IRC: y5nw
Location: Germany

Re: [Server] LinuxForks (Lots of trains)

by yw05 » Post

MrBee wrote:
Tue Dec 27, 2022 21:00
Mostly seems like admins just have to add barriers & teleports for these areas. Nothing stops player from intruding into area so basically banning players for reasons like this seems to be kinda weird.
56independent and Blockhead made an interesting point on keeping intruders out by making some additions to the areas mod. There is always the possibility of pulling the Ethernet cable (or something similar), but the effect is mostly limited, and I think the engine could provide an API to avoid this.

I have already pointed out how it is not particularly realistic to add (and, more importantly, update) these barriers, so that is out of the question, especially for large areas:
yw05 wrote:
Tue Dec 27, 2022 11:11
56independent_actual wrote:
Tue Dec 27, 2022 10:19
yw05 wrote:
Tue Dec 27, 2022 09:55
Building a wall around the area is quite unrealistic
//set mese:mese

Fixed it (/j)!
If that was the only to address:
yw05 wrote:
Tue Dec 27, 2022 09:55
[...] that does not count in the time you need to change the wall if you expand the city; [...]
In other words, the admin would then spend time WE-ing constructions site walls instead of working on other things, and that does not take into consideration that this is a survival server.

Also, terrain differences mean that you need to take quite some care to make the wall not look ugly, which would likely involve more work than building the wall manually (with a digtron) in the first place.
In my opinion this "malicious intruder" really wants to play here, be merciful if you are judging for reasons like "not appreciating visitors"
This is not the first incident of such type. Determining the punishment based on how vocal someone is is obviously not fair

If you "really want to play here", you need to follow the rules, and if you mean "really want to play" by repeatedly entering an area that is out of bounds despite having been warned already as I described earlier, I don't see how a ban is not justifiable; and add that to the usual chat spamming that moderators here do not appreciate, to say the least.
56independent_actual wrote:
Tue Dec 27, 2022 21:02
yw05 wrote:
Tue Dec 27, 2022 20:52
Yes, but not all moderators are online at the moment, and some are busy.
Please, record the court proceeding and publish it so we can see the Justice system of LF. Maybe Edward Snowden will get involved!
There is always the server log.
MrBee wrote:
Tue Dec 27, 2022 21:10
56independent_actual wrote:
Tue Dec 27, 2022 21:02
Please, record the court proceeding and publish it so we can see the Justice system of LF. Maybe Edward Snowden will get involved!
Lmao jury trial in minetest. Do we have a lawyer for MineBrother?
The thing is that moderators sometimes have opinions that vary quite wildly, so the result can depend on who is online at the moment (and you cannot expect every moderator to be online at the same time).

in any case, I guess this can be closed now that MineBrother has not yet shown up.
W3RQ01 wrote:
Tue Dec 27, 2022 21:20
I support MineBrother i think because i think that saying "restricted area" in minetest is useless and nonsensical.
Although then the question becomes:
  • What are the criteria for a rule that is "useless and nonsensical"?
  • If a player is allowed to disobey a particular rule with the justification that the rule is "useless and nonsensical", what are rules for? (and, more importantly, how then should a certain level or order be kept if this is desired?)
If you disapprove a rule, that is a different matter to discuss.

User avatar
MineBrother
Member
Posts: 62
Joined: Sat Sep 10, 2022 12:30
IRC: TestBoy
In-game: MineBrother
Location: Xanadu

Re: [Server] LinuxForks (Lots of trains)

by MineBrother » Post

Before You Take Me To Court, Please Remove This 2 Year Ban Please!
This Is What My Ban Looks Like:
Attachments
Screenshot (4901).png
Screenshot (4901).png (96.03 KiB) Viewed 3530 times

User avatar
Festus1965
Member
Posts: 4181
Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2016 11:58
GitHub: Festus1965
In-game: Festus1965 Thomas Thailand Explorer
Location: Thailand ChiangMai
Contact:

Re: [Server] LinuxForks (Lots of trains)

by Festus1965 » Post

OK, got it,
he got three warnings life and was teleported back, and just went there again ... = clear !
Human has no future (climate change)
If urgend, you find me in Roblox (as CNXThomas)

Post Reply